Step 2 – Ability Scores & Class-based vs. Point-based

Ok, I’ve listened and I think I’m going with my more moderate option (Option #8) and my experimental (Option #10). Hey, “fortune favors the bold” and all that jazz.

So, this means the YourOGL SRD (at least for now) will be split into two ‘flavors’: ‘A’ for the moderate approach and ‘B’ for the more experimental approach.

Option A: The standard 6 scores are divided into two groups (Body & Mind). There are a few twists though and for this option I’m going to try the Ability Score Check rule and fold the saving throws into the ability scores. The modifier number is the actual ability score.

Option B: Depending upon the player group’s the ability scores can be adjusted to be 2 (Body & Mind), 4 (Body, Grace, Mind, Spirit), or 8 (Strength, Constitution, Dexterity, Reflexes, Intelligence, Charisma, Wisdom, Willpower).

So, with that format in mind I’m going to define three difficulty settings for YourOGL:

Lite, Basic, Advanced

Lite – As simple as it gets. Perfect for beginners or those wanting a simple story telling kind of system.

Basic – A more detailed rule system for an experienced player who likes his game rules more “crunchy.”

Advanced – The ultimate crunchy version for those that want a game that tells them every little option or tactic they can use.

Now the idea is that this game can be adjusted for any of these three major flavors of difficulty, but they are all compatible and can all use various optional rules. So if someone created an Advanced game, but wanted to use Basic combat rules they could. That will be tricky, but I think that would make for a very flexible game.

What saye you?

Class-based vs. Point-based

Some OGL games, including the most famous RPG of all, use a class-based system. Others use point-based systems, where all traits have point values and are bought. Some players love the class-based, which is arguably easier for newbie’s to grasp. While others hate them and will only play point-based. So where will YourOGL stand in this battle?

What Has Already Been

Option #1
These OGL games use classes. Some use 6 basic classes based around their 6 ability scores: Strong hero, Tough hero, Fast hero, Smart hero, Dedicated hero and Charismatic hero.

Then they move up to what they call advanced classes (which in some versions is the class used for starting characters, not basic). Each class is a more specific type of concept that would be common in that genre. Modern: Soldier, Martial Artist, Gunslinger, Field Scientist, Investigator, etc. Fantasy: Barbarian, Ranger, Monk, Wizard, etc.

Then they move up to Prestige (sometimes called Expert) classes which are very specific class concepts like Holy/Unholy Knight, Ecclesiarch, Arcane Archer, Dragon Disciple, etc.

Advanced classes often have prerequisites that must be achieved as a basic class. Prestige classes have prerequisites that often must be achieved as an advanced class.

Meanwhile, most versions do not use basic classes at all and start with the advanced classes.

Option #2
Option 2 uses advanced-type classes, but each class has point values per level. This is an interesting way of mixing point-based with class-based.

Option #3
Option 3 only uses basic classes (sometimes called Roles). There are often three or six of these. Each role defines what it is best at, while allowing access per level to general feats and feats specific for that role. The Roles may have backgrounds or Paths that help essentially to classify the role.

Option #4
No classes, pure point-based.

What I’m Thinking

Naming Time: Should we call these classes, roles, archetypes, or something else?

Option #5
How about a hybrid system? I’m thinking about having 3 or 4 four basic classes (similar to Option 3) for use at Lite & Basic level of play. Then full blown limitless variations of classes at Advanced level of play. All of these will be balanced equally per level, so they are compatible and can even be played together (newbie plays a basic, while everyone else plays an advanced). Plus, the option to simply ignore the classes and create your character pure point-based. What saye you?

So if this is point-based, we need to come up with a point-based value for everything. I think either:

Option #1 - 1 character point (should we call it something else?) = 1 skill point
Option #2 - 1 character point = 2 skill points
Option #3 - 1 character point = 4 skill points

The third option makes for some easy point keeping (essentially turning everything into feat slots), but the first one would cover all numbering possibilities. Nothing is cheaper than 1 skill point. Of course the second option is a middle of the road type of solution. What saye you?

To put it in perspective there are a number of feats that give bonuses to skills. Usually +2 ranks to two specific skills or +3 ranks to be used for any one skill. Let’s assume for arguments sake that that means 1 feat equals 4 skill points.

Option #1
Name Character Point Value
1 skill point 1 character point
2 skill points 2 character points
1 feat rank/slot 4 character points

Option #2
Name Character Point Value
1 skill point 0.5 character point
2 skill points 1 character point
1 feat rank/slot 2 character points

Option #3
Name Character Point Value
1 skill point .25 character point
2 skill points .5 character point
1 feat rank/slot 1 character point

Yeah, I’m leaning toward #1. This will lead to larger and larger totals of character points (yuck), but we can avoid 0.5 or 0.25 values. Of course #2 would help decrease the large point totals, while still avoiding most situations of points being less that 1.

How many character points per level? Hmm…we’ll get to that on the next installment.

Next: Point values for our ability scores, per level and more.

Until next time…Marx out.

Step 1 - Ability Scores

WARNING: Some of this is stream of conscious stuff, so expect grammar errors (or worse…rambling). I promise the SRD will be more detailed, structured, and nearly grammar error free.

I do not name (except in Section 15 of the license at the bottom) any of the titles of the OGL systems I am references. I do this because I don’t want to break the rules of the OGL by claiming any compatibility or using their PI. I just want you to understand that I’m not doing it out of a desire to take credit away from anyone, I’m just following the rules. If a publisher contacts me and says they want me to use the title, I’m game.

Ability Scores

The beginning of any good game system is its ability scores. They make or break anything your character tries to do.

Naming things: Should we call them Ability scores or something else? For example Stats, Attributes, or Characteristics? Remember all terms in the YourOGL SRD are supposed to be as setting neutral as possible and there is no rule that you can’t later change a term to better fit your setting (actually I encourage it). It is just recommended that you somewhere note the term change.

What Has Already Been

So, what has OGL already done?

Option #1

Most OGL games use the common 6 ability scores. Half deal with the physical side of your character and the other half deal with the non-physical side of your character.

Strength: Strength is a measure of sheer muscle power and the ability to apply it.

Dexterity: Dexterity is a measure of the character’s hand-eye co-ordination, agility, reflexes, and balance.

Constitution: Constitution determines your character’s endurance, health, and stamina.

Charisma: Charisma describes the character’s strength of persuasion, personality, and attractiveness (not necessarily physical).

Intelligence: Intelligence is a measure of the character’s reasoning, memory, and quick thinking.

Wisdom: Wisdom is a reflection of the character’s willpower, common sense, intuition, perception, and life experience.

Creation of the ability scores is typically done via a rolling method that usually isn’t OGC. In some point-based OGL systems, you can use points to buy them. The normal human range is 3 to 18. Each score has a corresponding modifier number: (ability/2) -5 [round result down]. This modifier number modifies (hence the name) skills checks, attack bonuses (Strength or Dexterity), Hit Points (Constitution), etc.

An example of point-based would be: All your ability scores default to 10, and you have 12 points to spend between your six abilities. You can also lower some abilities below 10 in order to gain additional points, earning one bonus ability point for each point you take away from one or more other abilities.

Alternatively, one point-based system rolls the ability scores by rolling four six-sided dice (4d6) and total the three highest results to determine the ability’s score.

Option #2

Some OGL system’s ability scores are nearly identical to the above, except the ability score is the modifier number, which tends to streamline things a bit. Also, how the ability scores effect combat is modified, but we will save that for a future discussion.

Option #3

One OGL game uses 12 ability scores in 4 groups:

Body Group: Stats dealing with physical health.

• Constitution (CON): Your ability to shake off shock, poison, disease, and parasites. (An elderly gent might not be very Strong or Tough, but could have a health better than most twenty-year-olds!)
• Strength (STR): Your ability to make physical efforts. This covers lifting, kicking stuff around, et cetera.
• Toughness: How well built you are. How much damage you can take is derived from this.

Grace Group: Stats dealing with physical prowess.

• Dexterity (DEX): Your physical prowess, as relates to 'active' uses. Thus, to hit someone in combat, you would use this stat.
• Movement Speed (MOV): How fast you are. This is used for movement as well as initiative; faster people go first.
• Reflexes (REF): Your response time; 'passive' uses of physical prowess fall under this attribute. This is used to avoid being hit in combat!

Mind Group: Stats dealing with mental prowess.

• Charisma (CHA): Your charm, force of will, and social skills; how well you do in whatever part of society you live in.
• Intelligence (INT): Education, cleverness, and the ability to learn come under this attribute.
• Technical (TECH): Your ability to make fine manipulations is not the same as Dexterity, as this covers using tools and making adjustments. As this covers attention to detail, it also covers many 'mechanic' or 'technological' skills.

Spirit Group: Stats dealing with mental health.

• Creativity (CRE): Your ingenuity and ability to act extemporaneously.
• Gnosis (GNO): Gnosis covers your wisdom, insight, and perception: in other words, it's how 'clued-in' you are.
• Willpower (WILL): Your determination and patience; how well you keep yourself together.

Option #4

BODY GROUP

The three attributes that define a character’s “body” or physical being are Health, Strength, and Reflexes.

Strength (STR)

Strength is the “Power” attribute for the Body Group. STR represents raw physical prowess, including the ability to lift, push and otherwise exert force.

Reflexes (REF)

Reflexes is the “Aptitude” attribute for the Body group. REF covers the character’s agility, coordination, reaction, and overall speed.

Health (HLT)

Health is the “Resistance” attribute for the Body Group. HLT reflects the character’s overall constitution, general health, resistance to disease, and overall fitness.

MIND GROUP

The three attributes that define the character’s “mind” or mental and emotional being are Presence, Intellect, and Will.

Presence (PRE)

Presence is the “Power” attribute for the Mind Group. PRE represents the character’s general personality, charm, charisma, and innate persuasiveness.

Intellect (INT)

Intellect is the “Aptitude” attribute for the Mind Group. INT represents the sharpness of the character’s mind, clarity of thought and overall alertness.

Will (WIL)

Will (abbreviated WIL) is the “Resistance” attribute for the Mind Group. WIL reflects the character’s mental strength, ego, and force of conviction.

Option #5

No Fixed Attributes. The GM chooses attributes that match the genre played and suit individual taste. A GM designing a simple game may choose only two attributes (Body and Mind, for instance), or may dispense with attributes entirely and have a character's abilities entirely defined by skills, gifts, and faults. Another Gamemaster may choose 6 attributes, or 10, or more. There are a lot of attributes to choose from.

Option #6

One OGL game uses Aspects instead of Ability scores.

Players pick one or more aspects to represent important elements of the character that can tie into the events of the phase.

Aspects are used to describe any element of the character. Aspects include things like attributes (Strong, Weak, Agile, Charismatic, Tough, Fast, Slow), descriptors (Dutiful Charming, Alert, Dramatic), careers (Knight, Mercenary, Musketeer, Cutthroat) or even ties to the setting (Merry Man of Sherwood, Initiate of the Blue Wind, Fiodario Fencing Academy). Aspects may be good, bad or both but they should always reflect some important element of the character.

Option #7

All characters and creatures have seven Characteristics/ability scores.

Strength (STR): A character’s brute force, Strength affects the amount of damage he deals, what weapons he can wield effectively, how much he can lift and so on.

Constitution (CON): A measure of the character’s health, Constitution affects how much damage he can sustain in combat, as well as his general resistance to disease and other illnesses.

Dexterity (DEX): A character’s agility, co-ordination and speed, Dexterity aids him in many physical actions, including combat.

Size (SIZ): This is an indication of the character’s mass and, like Strength and Constitution, can affect the amount of damage a character can deal and how well he can absorb damage. Unlike most other Characteristics, a high score in Size is not always an advantage. While a large character can take more damage, a small character will have a much easier time when sneaking around in the shadows.

Intelligence (INT): A character’s ability to think around problems, analyze information and memorize instructions. It is a very useful Characteristic for characters interested in becoming accomplished spellcasters.

Power (POW): Perhaps the most abstract Characteristic, Power is a measure of the character’s life force and his personal force of will.

Charisma (CHA): This quantifies a character’s attractiveness and leadership qualities.

So, the basic difference here is that there is Size and that Wisdom (essentially) is called Power.

What I’m Thinking

Now let’s talk about what I’m thinking about doing with ability scores.

Option # 8 (Moderate Option)

First the more moderate route. The system would use a very similar system as Option #2. Everyone is used to it and this version is a little more streamlined by making the modifier number the actual ability score.

Option #9 (More Experimental Option)

Now for the more experimental option. It may be because I only recently discovered it (smell that ‘new car’ fragrance), but I’m leaning toward Option #3’s use of ability scores. Why? Ok, so it is 12 ability scores versus 6, but you can condense them to 4 for basic games and minor characters. A basic game would be truly streamlined, even more than Option #2 (4 vs. 6). While an advanced game would be even more specific on how you can modify your character. I would also like to use the modifier score as the number used for the ability scores, in the same way as Option #2 does, except in this case (if we go the Option #3 ability score route) it would be:

Ability Scores = 12 points divided between twelve abilities.

You have 12 points to divide among your character’s abilities, which all start at 0, neither a bonus nor a penalty. This means you can have +1 in all twelve abilities; +6 in one ability, 0 in five others, and +1 in the remaining six; or any combination adding up to 12.

If you choose to have a negative value in an ability, you gain bonus points to assign to your other ability scores. For example, if you give your character Strength –1, you have 1 more point to assign to ability (such as Intelligence). If your character has Strength –2, you have 2 bonus points, and so on. Characters cannot have abilities lower than –5, and abilities lower than –2 aren’t recommended unless the character is seriously deficient in that ability.

Want to make it more basic? Then use:

Ability Scores = 4 points divided between 4 ability groups (Body, Grace, Mind, Spirit).

To me that seems like a more streamlined version of an OGL game, which can both be used for a very basic game or a very advanced game. Heck, you can play a character using the basic four next to a character with advanced 12. The only problem would be that the basic character isn’t as flexible, which the whole reason why it is basic. A few sessions later a player can easily convert his basic character’s ability scores into an advanced character’s if desired.

Of course we could go really crazy and use something inspired by Option #7 and have it be really flexible. Depending upon the player group it could be adjusted to be 2 (Body & Mind), 4 (Body, Grace, Mind, Spirit), 6 (the standard), or 12 (Option #3). Of course, beginning costs and leveling up costs would have to be modified depending on which version someone is using.

Option #10 (Hmm…)

Ok, I just wrote all that and came up with another possibility. Depending on the difficulty level they could be adjusted to 2 (Physical & Non-Physical), 4 (Body, Grace, Mind, Spirit), or 8 (details below). Notice I changed the names from each stage so they don’t confuse. We are now missing the standard 6, but that may be ok.

The 8 options would be: Strength, Constitution, Dexterity, Reflexes, Intelligence, Charisma, Willpower, Gnosis

Body Group: Stats dealing with physical health.

• Strength (STR): Your ability to make physical efforts. This covers lifting, kicking stuff around, et cetera. (This would give bonuses to melee damage, lifting capacity, and perhaps a bonus for parrying.)
• Constitution (CON): Your ability to shake off shock, poison, disease, parasites, and how much damage you can take. (This would combine the usual benefits of CON and the Fortitude saving throw)

Grace Group: Stats dealing with physical prowess.

• Dexterity (DEX): Your physical prowess, as relates to 'active' uses. Thus, to hit someone in combat, you would use this stat. (This would give you bonuses to hit in combat.)
• Reflexes (REF): Your response time and generally how fast you are; 'passive' uses of physical prowess fall under this attribute. This is used to avoid being hit in combat! As well as movement and initiative. (This is your Reflex save combined with your bonus to defense and a little bonus to movement.)

Mind Group: Stats dealing with mental prowess.

• Charisma (CHA): Your charm, force of will, and social skills; how well you do in whatever part of society you live in. (Bonuses to skills.)
• Intelligence (INT): Education, cleverness, and the ability to learn come under this attribute. (Bonuses to skills.)

Spirit Group: Stats dealing with mental health.

• Gnosis (GNO): Gnosis covers your wisdom, insight, ingenuity, and perception: in other words, it's how 'clued-in' you are. (This is some of your usual wisdom bonuses.)
• Willpower (WILL): Your determination and patience; how well you keep yourself together. (This combines some of the usual Wisdom bonuses and the Willpower saving throw.)

Secondary Ability Scores (or whatever we want to call it):

Hit Points (This is your lethal damage.)

Stun Points (This is your non-lethal damage.) (Or should I stick with the usual subdual/non-lethal damage rules?)

Initiative (REF + GNO)

Luck/Action/Fate Points (GNO+WILL) More on these later.

Walk (30 + MOV), Jog (Walk x2), Run (Walk x4), Sprint, Swim, Leap

Soak (CON) This could be an optional rule where you have damage resistance against non-lethal damage.

Endurance (END) Another possible optional rule.

So, your usual twenty-sider saving throws would be handled by ability checks.

Sample Ability Check DC

Common, everyday task 0

Minor challenge, something you may have to do once per day 5

Difficult task, something the average person finds tough 10

Daunting challenge, rare for the common man and hard for a hero 15

Formidable challenge that even heroes find difficult 20

Almost impossible; none but the mightiest have a chance of success 25

Feats could give some bonuses, while we could add the optional Ability Strain rule.

STRAIN AND ABILITY CHECKS

Since ability score bonuses remain relatively static, it is difficult for players to find ways to improve them. Even if you limit yourself to a narrow range of Difficulty Classes, the

players may fail ability checks more often than they succeed at them without many options to better their chances.

To solve this problem, each ability check type includes a new option called strain. In return for a persistent drawback of some sort, you can gain a bonus to an ability check. For example, you can push your body to the point of injury when attempting a Strength check. In this case, you gain a bonus to your check in return for suffering hit point damage. The ability score checks all have similar options that allow you to weigh drawbacks against the benefits of a bonus.

Alternatively, we could not use ability score checks and instead do all checks using secondary ability scores (saving throws, etc), skills (Fortitude skill check, etc.), or combination of the two. If everyone hates the idea of blending saving throws into ability scores, then I would prefer turning them into skills. I would really like to streamline them somehow.

One thing I like about this version is it seems rather balanced. With 8 there is an external(offense)/internal(defense) dynamic between each two. The 4 seems very balanced, just not as easy to build a unique character. Of course 2 is very, very basic, but that is the point.

Option # 11

Ok, one last possibility (not sure about this one) would be 2 (physical, non-physical), 6 (standard), 12. OR…the 2, 4, and 8 that I mentioned above with 6 stuck in the middle for you guys that just have to have the standard 6 (to fold or not to fold the saving throws, that is the question).

Final Comments

Hmm…so what do you think? I’ve presented 11 options, plus minor variations. I think this method of creating YourOGL may truly be great fun. Not only does it let you see how it is created and give your opinions before anything is set in stone (you’re my reality check on this stuff), but I’m finding that by writing all this down I’m coming up with new ideas every minute.

Option #10 (2, 4, 8) is pretty radically different, but it does streamline the ability scores and fold saving throws into them. It makes ability scores even more important and it allows you to compress or decompress them depending on how complicated you want it. Let me know what you think.

I know that some of you will want to stick with the exact same ability scores as the original SRD. But don’t automatically default to that option because it is something you are used too. Definitely don’t go that way out of a desire to make this game 100% compatible to other OGL systems. The only OGL game 100% compatible is that same OGL game. A character created in one OGL game will always be more powerful (or less powerful) level-by-level than one created in another OGL game. I want this game to build upon all the excellent OGL material out of there, but it needs to also stand alone and be its own game.

Next: I’ll absorb your feedback, and then move forward to the details on beginning character creation (specifics on the ability scores & point-based vs. class-based).

Until next time…Marx out.

OPEN GAME LICENSE Version 1.0a

The following text is the property of Wizards of the Coast, Inc. and is Copyright 2000 Wizards of the Coast, Inc ("Wizards"). All Rights Reserved.

1. Definitions: (a)"Contributors" means the copyright and/or trademark owners who have contributed Open Game Content; (b)"Derivative Material" means copyrighted material including derivative works and translations (including into other computer languages), potation, modification, correction, addition, extension, upgrade, improvement, compilation, abridgment or other form in which an existing work may be recast, transformed or adapted; (c) "Distribute" means to reproduce, license, rent, lease, sell, broadcast, publicly display, transmit or otherwise distribute; (d)"Open Game Content" means the game mechanic and includes the methods, procedures, processes and routines to the extent such content does not embody the Product Identity and is an enhancement over the prior art and any additional content clearly identified as Open Game Content by the Contributor, and means any work covered by this License, including translations and derivative works under copyright law, but specifically excludes Product Identity. (e) "Product Identity" means product and product line names, logos and identifying marks including trade dress; artifacts; creatures characters; stories, storylines, plots, thematic elements, dialogue, incidents, language, artwork, symbols, designs, depictions, likenesses, formats, poses, concepts, themes and graphic, photographic and other visual or audio representations; names and descriptions of characters, spells, enchantments, personalities, teams, personas, likenesses and special abilities; places, locations, environments, creatures, equipment, magical or supernatural abilities or effects, logos, symbols, or graphic designs; and any other trademark or registered trademark clearly identified as Product identity by the owner of the Product Identity, and which specifically excludes the Open Game Content; (f) "Trademark" means the logos, names, mark, sign, motto, designs that are used by a Contributor to identify itself or its products or the associated products contributed to the Open Game License by the Contributor (g) "Use", "Used" or "Using" means to use, Distribute, copy, edit, format, modify, translate and otherwise create Derivative Material of Open Game Content. (h) "You" or "Your" means the licensee in terms of this agreement.

2. The License: This License applies to any Open Game Content that contains a notice indicating that the Open Game Content may only be Used under and in terms of this License. You must affix such a notice to any Open Game Content that you Use. No terms may be added to or subtracted from this License except as described by the License itself. No other terms or conditions may be applied to any Open Game Content distributed using this License.

3.Offer and Acceptance: By Using the Open Game Content You indicate Your acceptance of the terms of this License.

4. Grant and Consideration: In consideration for agreeing to use this License, the Contributors grant You a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license with the exact terms of this License to Use, the Open Game Content.

5.Representation of Authority to Contribute: If You are contributing original material as Open Game Content, You represent that Your Contributions are Your original creation and/or You have sufficient rights to grant the rights conveyed by this License.

6.Notice of License Copyright: You must update the COPYRIGHT NOTICE portion of this License to include the exact text of the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any Open Game Content You are copying, modifying or distributing, and You must add the title, the copyright date, and the copyright holder's name to the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any original Open Game Content you Distribute.

7. Use of Product Identity: You agree not to Use any Product Identity, including as an indication as to compatibility, except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of each element of that Product Identity. You agree not to indicate compatibility or co-adaptability with any Trademark or Registered Trademark in conjunction with a work containing Open Game Content except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of such Trademark or Registered Trademark. The use of any Product Identity in Open Game Content does not constitute a challenge to the ownership of that Product Identity. The owner of any Product Identity used in Open Game Content shall retain all rights, title and interest in and to that Product Identity.

8. Identification: If you distribute Open Game Content You must clearly indicate which portions of the work that you are distributing are Open Game Content.

9. Updating the License: Wizards or its designated Agents may publish updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized version of this License to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License.

10 Copy of this License: You MUST include a copy of this License with every copy of the Open Game Content You Distribute.

11. Use of Contributor Credits: You may not market or advertise the Open Game Content using the name of any Contributor unless You have written permission from the Contributor to do so.

12 Inability to Comply: If it is impossible for You to comply with any of the terms of this License with respect to some or all of the Open Game Content due to statute, judicial order, or governmental regulation then You may not Use any Open Game Material so affected.

13 Termination: This License will terminate automatically if You fail to comply with all terms herein and fail to cure such breach within 30 days of becoming aware of the breach. All sublicenses shall survive the termination of this License.

14 Reformation: If any provision of this License is held to be unenforceable, such provision shall be reformed only to the extent necessary to make it enforceable.

15 COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Open Game License v 1.0 Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.

System Reference Document, Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast, Inc., Authors Jonathan Tweet, Monte Cook, Skip Williams, based on original material by E. Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson.

Modern System Reference Document Copyright 2002-2004, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.; Authors Bill Slavicsek, Jeff Grubb, Rich Redman, Charles Ryan, Eric Cagle, David Noonan, Stan!, Christopher Perkins, Rodney
Thompson, and JD Wiker, based on material by Jonathan Tweet, Monte
Cook, Skip Williams, Richard Baker, Peter Adkison, Bruce R. Cordell, John
Tynes, Andy Collins, and JD Wiker.

Action! System Core Rules version 1.1 copyright 2003 by Gold Rush Games; Authors Mark Arsenault, Patrick Sweeney, Jon Winn.

Core Elements, copyright 2005, Butch Curry, Author James Hargrove.

F20 copyright 2004-2005 Timothy Jones.

FATE (Fantastic Adventures in Tabletop Entertainment) copyright 2003 by Evil Hat Productions; Authors Robert Donoghue and Fred Hicks

Fudge System Reference Document Copyright 2005, Grey Ghost Press, Inc.; Authors Steffan O’Sullivan and Ann Dupuis, with additional material by Peter Bonney, Deird’Re Brooks, Reimer Behrends, Shawn Garbett, Steven Hammond, Ed Heil, Bernard Hsiung, Sedge Lewis, Gordon McCormick, Kent Matthewson, Peter Mikelsons, Anthony Roberson, Andy Skinner, Stephan Szabo, John Ughrin., Dmitri Zagidulin

Live System © 2003-2004, Postmortem Studios (James Desborough).

Open Core copyright 2004 by Battlefield Press, Authors Christopher Helton and Jonathan Thompson

RuneQuest System Reference Document Copyright 2006, Mongoose Publishing; Author Matthew Sprange, based on original material by Greg Stafford.

Spycraft Copyright 2001, Alderac Entertainment Group.

True20 Adventure Roleplaying, Copyright 2005, Green Ronin Publishing; Author Steve Kenson.

YourOGL Step 1 - Ability Scores, Copyright 2006, Author Marx Pyle

Introducing...YourOGL

Well, I’ve got another crazy idea. I’ve been tinkering with an Open Gaming License (OGL) twenty-sider game off and on for over a year now. I have come to two conclusions:

1. A new OGL rule system, by an unknown publisher, released via PDF (and perhaps even in print) would have little chance of being picked up and would probably die a quick death (which would be a waste of time). I would probably make a few bucks and occasionally run across someone at a convention who knows someone who knows someone who once read it. So, except for some quick dough and an occasional ego stroke, it wouldn’t be worth it.
   
2. I’ve looked at so many of the OGL games out there, but can’t help but find problems with certain parts of the rules or get frustrated with the lack of building upon existing Open Gaming Content (OGC) versus creating something brand new that is far too often not as good as the original.

I decided to think back on what got people excited about OGL in the first place. It was going to be a universal system, a universal ‘language of gaming’, if you will. The core rules would be free for all to read making fan accessories easy to do. It would allow publishers to tweak and torque the rules to make a better and stronger game system over time.

So, years later what do we have? Well, the d20 system is still popular with certain game settings, but overall has lost its flair and has barely ‘evolved’ over time (3.0 to 3.5). There are even rumors of a 4th edition that won’t be OGL (ack). OGL spin-offs are becoming more popular, but really only Green Ronin’s True20 and Mutants & Masterminds are doing exceptionaly well. Anime d20 will fade away now that GoO has closed shop. Spycraft 2.0 has gotten a second chance, but it remains to be seen how well it will do in the long run. Other OGL games have done moderately well, while others have not. d20, d20 Modern and Anime d20 are the only twenty-sider games to ever create free SRDs. Non-twenty-sider OGL games that have free SRDs include Action, Fate and Fudge.

I want to bring back that excitement. I want the fans to have a game system they can rally behind. I want to take OGL to the next step in its evolution. I…well I’m also a little bored and this sounds like fun. ;)

So, what is YourOGL? It is the first (to my knowledge) OGL game that will allow fans to see it as it is being developed and chime in. The first where all players, not just a select playtest group, can help guide its creation.

So here it goes:

Step 1: I will present a different rule section every other week (or so). You email or post on the blog what you think. This is your chance to tell me what you think should be changed, submit open game content to be added, tell me what you like, etc. Constructive criticism only! No flame wars! “Me no like,” type statements with no explanation or opinions of what would work better will be ignored. Based upon your input I will modify the rule section.

Step 2: I will post a 1st draft System Reference Document (SRD). This will be the basic rules only, based upon your input. Now is your chance to tell me what I should change for the next draft.

Step 3: I probably will create a PDF with a more detailed collection of the rules, additional rules, better formatting and art. It will be cheap and most of the money will be used to keep the site up or buy OGL books to research for more rules.

Step 4: I will list all websites or books that use the rule system. One central hub where you can find all YourOGL books.

Not only will this be a cool way for an RPG system to be made and allow you to help create a game system that you want to play, but it will be a great ‘how-to’ guide to creating an OGL RPG.

The Fine Print

Now the last of the details. The YourOGL and Your(Mature)OGL names and logos (logos coming soon) are my product identity (you can find the ‘legaleze’ in all future YourOGL stuff in the license section as is standard for OGL games). You can’t use it unless I say it is ok (can I be any clearer?). There is no fee. All you are asked to do is contact me. I will send you a short form to fill out. Then you send me an electronic copy and I will contact you with permission or not. Nearly all books will be ok’d unless it is basically just a re-print of the SRD that offers nothing new (why?) or it includes racist/sexist/allother-“ist” remarks. So please don’t bother sending those to me, I hate playing the bad guy and saying no (especially if you should know better). Excessive sexual content or violence is ok (huzzah!) – but you will have to use the Your(Mature)OGL logo instead of the main logo. Cool? Not clear on what crosses the ‘Mature’ line? Then contact me.

I’m not asking much here. Just basic quality control and labeling of mature books. By having books sent to me I can keep track of what is out there and list it on the site. I can also highlight high-quality books that may be from unknowns that would otherwise get little attention. Keep in mind that you only need to contact me if you want to use one of the logos and/or state compatibility with YourOGL. If all you want to do is use the rules from the SRD, as is standard with all OGL games, you are free to do so without permission.

‘YourOGL needs you!’

BUT for any of this to succeed I need you to play your part. Give me feedback, point out errors, submit OGC (open game content), tell everyone about the rule system, write fan or professional supplements, etc. Also keep in mind if bandwidth gets heavy, I will have to rely on the usual ADA (Ads, Donations, and Affiliate) trio to keep up the site.

I want the core system to be a ‘community-based’ game system. If I get little help or no feedback, then don’t expect me to keep slaving away on it. I’ll either drop it completely or go all hermit and finish it on my own.

So, without further ado, here is a list of all (that I know of) current OGL systems out there with links to either their SRD or PDF (some are free, some are not). Feel free to read over them and start thinking about what you would like to see.

List of OGL Systems

At the end of each article I will have the OGL license with all OGL games listed that are discussed to date.

It Begins!

The first section will be ability scores. I will briefly present all options used in the other OGL games, then tell you what one, or probably combination of ones that I’m thinking about using (usually presented in two choices: moderate & experimental). If you have a system of ability scores you would like considered (already published or your own creation), then contact me right away and I will include it in the options.

Here is what I’m thinking for the overall rule system. The rules will be OGL twenty-sider based (because everyone understands it) that has a basic version and an advanced version or at least is flexible enough to be modified for various difficulty levels. I’m also open to optional rules for the SRD, so feel free to send them in for peer review. Lastly, I’m not against creating variant YourOGL systems that are not based on the ‘sacred’ twenty-sided die (perhaps one that is percentile-based or six-sided based).

It is my belief that the game mechanics often define the setting of a game. By making the mechanics universal, the setting often becomes generic and it can stifle creativity. BUT I think if we think outside the box, we can make YourOGL flexible enough to be modified to fit nearly any setting (variant rules, flexible terminology, ability to modify difficulty, etc). In the end, there is no perfect system (and if there was, there would still be people complaining about it), but there are some great OGL games out there to build upon. I want this to be a ‘community-based’ game. I am ultimately the designer who calls the final shots, but everyone can playtest, help fix errors, create new open game content, create variant rules and create new game settings using the rules. All of these have been done before, but never all together and the process has never been this transparent. This idea excites me and I hope it at least perks your curiosity.

So join the OGL re-evolution! Let’s work together to create a really cool OGL game!

Feel free to email with any questions. Feel free to send open gaming content you would like considered for YourOGL, but be sure to ask via email first before sending any attachments. Due to spam and viruses I will delete all emails with attachments from addresses I am not familiar with. I have also put up Version 1.0 of the YourOGL FAQ, just click…here.

Next: Ability Scores

Until next time…Marx out.